Job-normed standards will prevent discrimination and ensure we have equality on the battlefield instead of situations like this: An infantryperson is an infantryperson a tanker is a tanker. Bye-bye, discriminatory 42 and 19 push-ups, earrings, and haircut styles! There is only one standard in combat, and there should be one standard for training: whatever the position requires. The only realistic way to do this is to abolish sex-specific training, clothing, and grooming standards. The military, all parties agree, should not lower standards for women. What, it was ok for men but not with the braver, newer, more-equal military? Equality in standardsĪbsolutely. Unfortunately, faced with the reality of consequences, some women now advocate getting rid of the draft. Obviously, this should apply to women too. Further, failing to register or comply with the Military Selective Service Act is a felony punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 or a prison term of up to five years, or a combination of both. Concomitant with this, of course, is having the same consequences that men face for not registering.įor men, not registering means not being eligible for federal student aid, state-funded student financial aid in many states, most federal employment, some state employment, security clearance for contractors, job training under the Workforce Investment Act, and U.S. With Ash Carter’s decision to put women into combat roles, it’s time to get women in the draft.
#Are women given preferential treatment full
Of course! Rostker Vs Goldberg, in 1981 made very clear that the only real barrier to full Selective Service participation was the exclusion of women from combat roles. I have a few suggestions to help them put their money where their politically-correct mouths are: go Full Metal Equality, with concrete actions for fair and effective results, and quit giving just lip service to a gender-neutral force.
Military leaders who say that women can do whatever men can are just sucking up for promotions it’s still clearly an unequal environment. It was almost like they accepted it because they liked the outcome even though the means to that end was not the most favorable.Even though women are eligible for combat roles and have earned the Ranger Tab, the military still isn’t a level playing field for men and women. How would this make you feel? I was close with a few of these girls so I did ask them and they told me that they liked it, but only because it meant they got out of doing a night shift (which then had to go to a guy). I loved working with them and they were all very competent and self sufficient. We were all the same age, same qualifications, same everything.
#Are women given preferential treatment professional
Now to make it clear, all of us these women were highly educated professional women just like everyone else. Well, every time a late shift was needed my bosses (both a man and woman) would say explicitly "I don't want any of the girls coming in at night." They would actually say this! They would usually follow it up with something along the lines of "it's not safe for them" or "it's too hard on the women." There were about 5 women in my group, mostly in their 20s. I honestly feel safer there than in my own home. The company is a large "campus" type environment with gates, cameras everywhere, and patrolling security guards 24/7.
It is mainly lab based research work, and there were many times where we would have to come in to conduct or finish an experiment in the middle of the night. I work at a pharmaceutical company which is open 24/7, so we have all shifts covered including the graveyard shift (10pm - 6am shift). What inspired this question was something I've experienced a few times at my current and previous job. As a woman, how would you feel if you were given preferential treatment in the workplace just because you were a woman? Would you accept that, object, or say anything?
0 kommentar(er)
